Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 28;8(9):1844–1859. doi: 10.18632/aging.101020

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participating cohorts.

Cohort N Ndeaths (%) Follow-up duration (years)* Age (years)* rHorvath rHannum
1. WHI (White) 995 309 (31%) 15.4 (14.0-16.4) 68 (65-72) 0.67 (p=5.1×10−131) 0.73 (p=8.0×10−167)
2. WHI (Black) 675 176 (26%) 15.4 (13.7-16.5) 62 (57-67) 0.70 (p=1.2×10−100) 0.76 (p=3.0×10−128)
3. WHI (Hispanic) 431 78 (18%) 15.2 (14.1-16.3) 61 (56-67) 0.78 (p=8.9×10−90) 0.79 (p=1.3×10−93)
4. LBC 1921 445 312 (70%) 10.2 (6.2-12.9) 79 (78-79) 0.15 (p=1.5×10−3) 0.13 (p=6.0×10−3)
5. LBC 1936 919 106 (12%) 7.5 (6.9-8.4) 69 (68-70) 0.15 (p=4.9×10−6) 0.16 (p=1.1×10−6)
6. NAS 647 221 (34%) 11.6 (8.6-12.9) 72 (68-77) 0.69 (p=1.3×10−92) 0.76 (p=8.2×10−123)
7. ARIC (Black) 2,768 1,075 (39%) 20.3 (14.3-21.4) 57 (52-62) 0.65 (p<1×10−200) 0.71 (p<1×10−200)
8. FHS 2,614 236 (9%) 6.2 (5.6-6.9) 66 (60-73) 0.84 (p<1×10−200) 0.86 (p<1×10−200)
9. KORA 1,257 42 (3%) 4.4 (4.0-4.8) 61 (54-68) 0.84 (p<1×10−200) 0.88 (p<1×10−200)
10. InCHIANTI 506 91 (18%) 15.0 (14.6-15.5) 67 (57-73) 0.82 (p=3.2×10−124) 0.85 (p=2.1×10−142)
11. Rotterdam 710 32 (5%) 5.6 (5.3-5.8) 58 (54-62) 0.72 (p=1.9×10−114) 0.76 (p=1.3×10−134)
12.Twins UK 805 30 (4%) 8.5 (7.5-8.5) 58 (51-65) 0.87 (p<1×10−200) 0.89 (p<1×10−200)
13. BLSA (white) 317 26 (8%) 5.3 (4.0-6.6) 66 (58-73) 0.85 (p=1.1×10−89) 0.88 (p=7.2×10−104)
Total 13,089 2734 (21%)

The last 3 columns report robust correlation coefficients (biweight midcorrelation) between chronological age and two epigenetic age estimates (Horvath and Hannum).

*

Median (25th percentile - 75th percentile)

Biweight midcorrelation coefficient of chronological age with epigenetic age using the Horvath method.

Biweight midcorrelation coefficient of chronological age with epigenetic age using the Hannum method.