Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participating cohorts.
Cohort | N | Ndeaths (%) | Follow-up duration (years)* | Age (years)* | rHorvath† | rHannum ‡ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. WHI (White) | 995 | 309 (31%) | 15.4 (14.0-16.4) | 68 (65-72) | 0.67 (p=5.1×10−131) | 0.73 (p=8.0×10−167) |
2. WHI (Black) | 675 | 176 (26%) | 15.4 (13.7-16.5) | 62 (57-67) | 0.70 (p=1.2×10−100) | 0.76 (p=3.0×10−128) |
3. WHI (Hispanic) | 431 | 78 (18%) | 15.2 (14.1-16.3) | 61 (56-67) | 0.78 (p=8.9×10−90) | 0.79 (p=1.3×10−93) |
4. LBC 1921 | 445 | 312 (70%) | 10.2 (6.2-12.9) | 79 (78-79) | 0.15 (p=1.5×10−3) | 0.13 (p=6.0×10−3) |
5. LBC 1936 | 919 | 106 (12%) | 7.5 (6.9-8.4) | 69 (68-70) | 0.15 (p=4.9×10−6) | 0.16 (p=1.1×10−6) |
6. NAS | 647 | 221 (34%) | 11.6 (8.6-12.9) | 72 (68-77) | 0.69 (p=1.3×10−92) | 0.76 (p=8.2×10−123) |
7. ARIC (Black) | 2,768 | 1,075 (39%) | 20.3 (14.3-21.4) | 57 (52-62) | 0.65 (p<1×10−200) | 0.71 (p<1×10−200) |
8. FHS | 2,614 | 236 (9%) | 6.2 (5.6-6.9) | 66 (60-73) | 0.84 (p<1×10−200) | 0.86 (p<1×10−200) |
9. KORA | 1,257 | 42 (3%) | 4.4 (4.0-4.8) | 61 (54-68) | 0.84 (p<1×10−200) | 0.88 (p<1×10−200) |
10. InCHIANTI | 506 | 91 (18%) | 15.0 (14.6-15.5) | 67 (57-73) | 0.82 (p=3.2×10−124) | 0.85 (p=2.1×10−142) |
11. Rotterdam | 710 | 32 (5%) | 5.6 (5.3-5.8) | 58 (54-62) | 0.72 (p=1.9×10−114) | 0.76 (p=1.3×10−134) |
12.Twins UK | 805 | 30 (4%) | 8.5 (7.5-8.5) | 58 (51-65) | 0.87 (p<1×10−200) | 0.89 (p<1×10−200) |
13. BLSA (white) | 317 | 26 (8%) | 5.3 (4.0-6.6) | 66 (58-73) | 0.85 (p=1.1×10−89) | 0.88 (p=7.2×10−104) |
Total | 13,089 | 2734 (21%) |
The last 3 columns report robust correlation coefficients (biweight midcorrelation) between chronological age and two epigenetic age estimates (Horvath and Hannum).
Median (25th percentile - 75th percentile)
Biweight midcorrelation coefficient of chronological age with epigenetic age using the Horvath method.
Biweight midcorrelation coefficient of chronological age with epigenetic age using the Hannum method.