Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 18;8(9):2023–2035. doi: 10.18632/aging.101048

Table 2. Correlation between ZFAS1 level in plasma and clinicopathologic of GC.

Feature No. of cases Mean ± SD P
Age
≥60 37 0.0227 ± 0.0242 0.3841
<60 40 0.0278 ± 0.0282
Gender
Male 46 0.0258 ± 0.0271 0.9486
Female 31 0.0248 ± 0.0255
Cancer location
Distal 17 0.0314 ± 0.0298 0.5767
Middle 25 0.0221 ± 0.0307
Proximal 35 0.0264 ± 0.0227
Diameter(cm)
≥5 18 0.0318 ± 0.0324 0.3493
<5 59 0.0234 ± 0.0242
Differentiation
Well 7 0.0214 ± 0.0159 0.135
Moderate 24 0.0185 ± 0.0214
Poor 46 0.0296 ± 0.0293
TNM stage
0, I and II 31 0.0216 ± 0.0278 0.0052*
III, IV 36 0.0297 ± 0.0242
Invasion
T0-T3 43 0.0223 ± 0.0273 0.0285*
T4 34 0.0293 ± 0.0249
Lymph-node metastasis
N0 44 0.0223 ± 0.0243 0.2937
N1-N3 33 0.0279 ± 0.0279
Distant metastasis
M0 73 0.0238 ± 0.0254 0.0154*
M1 4 0.0548 ± 0.0292
CEA
Positive 13 0.0265 ± 0.0229 0.5121
Negative 64 0.0251 ± 0.0271
CA19-9
Positive 11 0.0283 ± 0.0360 0.4397
Negative 66 0.0249 ± 0.0247
Negative 66 0.0249 ± 0.0247