Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 26;291(40):20849–20857. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R116.735894

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Top, properties of hydrated and un-hydrated Ca2+ and Mg2+. Bottom, Ca2+ and Mg2+ coordination to an EF protein motif (hypothetical comparison). The binding differences are determined by the chemical properties of the two metals described in Table 1, which explain the ease with which Ca2+ accepts binding sites of irregular geometry. Adapted from Ref. 7.