Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 24;11(10):e0165435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165435

Table 3. Comparative efficacy of biological agents for induction and maintenance therapy for anti-TNF therapy-experienced subpopulation.

Odds ratio (95% CrI)
Time point (Endpoint) Vedolizumab vs. adalimumab Vedolizumab vs. placebo Adalimumab vs. placebo
Induction
Clinical response 1.74 (0.69–4.45) 2.51* (1.18–5.48) 1.43 (0.79–2.64)
Clinical remission 2.72 (0.43–23.79) 3.66 (0.87–27.98) 1.37 (0.47–4.03)
Mucosal healing 1.56 (0.57–4.22) 1.70 (0.80–3.81) 1.09 (0.60–2.10)
Maintenance
Durable clinical response 2.04 (0.44–9.01) 4.89* (1.74–15.89) 2.47 (0.90–6.99)
Clinical remission 3.40 (0.40–32.52) 12.14* (3.14–78.38) 3.60* (1.01–18.23)
Mucosal healing 6.72* (1.36–41.17) 9.09* (2.74–40.06) 1.36 (0.50–3.91)

CrI, credible interval; OR, odds ratio; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.

* = significant.