Table 3. Comparative efficacy of biological agents for induction and maintenance therapy for anti-TNF therapy-experienced subpopulation.
Odds ratio (95% CrI) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Time point (Endpoint) | Vedolizumab vs. adalimumab | Vedolizumab vs. placebo | Adalimumab vs. placebo |
Induction | |||
Clinical response | 1.74 (0.69–4.45) | 2.51* (1.18–5.48) | 1.43 (0.79–2.64) |
Clinical remission | 2.72 (0.43–23.79) | 3.66 (0.87–27.98) | 1.37 (0.47–4.03) |
Mucosal healing | 1.56 (0.57–4.22) | 1.70 (0.80–3.81) | 1.09 (0.60–2.10) |
Maintenance | |||
Durable clinical response | 2.04 (0.44–9.01) | 4.89* (1.74–15.89) | 2.47 (0.90–6.99) |
Clinical remission | 3.40 (0.40–32.52) | 12.14* (3.14–78.38) | 3.60* (1.01–18.23) |
Mucosal healing | 6.72* (1.36–41.17) | 9.09* (2.74–40.06) | 1.36 (0.50–3.91) |
CrI, credible interval; OR, odds ratio; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
* = significant.