Table 2.
Contingency table of the degree of enhancement on CESM and lesion type on MG for each lesion type on histology.
| Mammography | p-value from Pearson’s chi-square test | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No finding | Microcalcifications | Mass | Mass with Microcalcifications | |||
| N (% from row) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |||
| All lesions (225 cases) | ||||||
| Degree of enhancement on CESM | Absent | 1 (3) | 8 (24) | 15 (45) | 9 (27) | <0.001 |
| Weak | 10 (17) | 10 (17) | 21 (35) | 19 (32) | ||
| Medium | 6 (9) | 3 (5) | 37 (61) | 15 (25) | ||
| Strong | 4 (6) | 3 (4) | 53 (75) | 11 (15) | ||
| Invasive carcinomas (127 cases) | ||||||
| Degree of enhancement on CESM | Absent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.002 |
| Weak | 7 (33) | 3 (14) | 6 (29) | 5 (24) | ||
| Medium | 4 (9) | 3 (7) | 24 (56) | 12 (28) | ||
| Strong | 3 (5) | 3 (5) | 46 (73) | 11 (17) | ||
| Intraductal carcinomas (16 cases) | ||||||
| Degree of enhancement on CESM | Absent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.180 |
| Weak | 0 | 6 (43) | 1 (7) | 7 (50) | ||
| Medium | 0 | 0 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | ||
| Strong | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Benign lesions (82 cases) | ||||||
| Degree of enhancement on CESM | Absent | 1 (3) | 8 (24) | 15 (45) | 9 (27) | 0.047 |
| Weak | 3 (12) | 1 (4) | 14 (56) | 7 (28) | ||
| Medium | 2 (13) | 0 | 12 (75) | 2 (13) | ||
| Strong | 1 (13) | 0 | 7 (88) | 0 | ||