Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2016 Jun 25;136(11):2168–2172. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.05.121

Table 1.

Comparison of thickness distributions among cohorts

Thickness (mm)
0.01–0.25 0.26–0.50 0.51–0.75 0.76–1.00

Cohort Period N % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI % 95% CI
SEER 2004–2010 51,855 21.0 (20.7–21.4) 42.3 (41.9–42.7) 22.4 (22.4–22.1) 14.2 (13.9–14.5)
SEER 1988–2003 42,851 18.8 (18.4–19.1) 40.8 (40.4–41.3) 24.7 (24.7–24.3) 15.7 (15.4–61.1)
Sweden 1990–2008 13,026 5.8 (5.4–6.2) 39.0 (38.2–39.8) 27.4 (27.3–26.6) 27.9 (27.1–28.6)
Queensland 1982–2006 26,736 8.9 (8.5–9.2) 43.2 (42.6–43.8) 31.3 (31.3–30.7) 16.6 (16.2–17.1)
Germany 1976–2000 12,728 8.4 (7.9–8.9) 36.3 (35.5–37.1) 29.7 (29.6–28.9) 25.6 (24.9–26.4)
PLG 1996–2006 1,315 15.0 (13.1–16.9) 41.4 (38.8–44.1) 26.1 (26.1–23.7) 17.5 (15.4–19.5)
PLG 1982–1995 1,056 10.1 (8.5–11.7) 37.6 (35.1–40.1) 29.1 (29.1–26.8) 23.2 (21.0–25.4)

Abbreviations: CI, Confidence Interval; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results; PLG, Pigmented Lesion Group.