Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Aug 17;143(2):326–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.231

Table 1. Selected model inputs.

Variable Base-case value (%) Range (%)
Screening test characteristicsa

 Probability of abnormal cytology (ASC-US+) given high-grade precancer or worse 70 40
 Probability of positive high-risk HPV DNA test given high-risk HPV 100 90
 Probability of abnormal biopsy (CIN2+) given high-grade precancer or worse 86

Unit costs Baseline ($) Range ($)

Physician consultationb
 Screening (cytology and/or HPV test) 122 61 - 244
 Verification of high-grade lesion (colposcopy w/biopsy) 258 129 - 516
Analyzing test sample at pathology laboratoryc
 Cytology 45 22 - 89
 HPV DNA test 39 20 - 79
 Cervical biopsy 124 62 - 247
Patient time and travel costsd
 Screening consultation 120 0
 Colposcopy examination 150 0
Precancer and cancer treatmente
 High-grade precancers 1,682 841 - 3,364
 Local cancer 26,941 13,471 - 53,882
 Regional cancer 56,601 28,301 - 113,202
 Distant cancer 41,367 20,684 - 82,735

ASC-US+: Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse, CIN2+: ce rvical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse, HPV: Human papillomavirus.

a

Based on primary data from the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry and published data.[29-33]

b

Based on published Norwegian fee schedules.

c

Based on actual resource use in Norwegian pathology laboratories (details available in the Supplementary Appendix).

d

Includes round-trip travel costs to attend physician consultation, as well as productivity losses associated with travel-, wait-, and consultation-time.

e

Based on published Norwegian fee schedules and includes patient time and travel costs. All costs are expressed in 2014 US dollars (US$ = NOK6.30).