Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 31;7(22):33391–33407. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8516

Table 6. Antitumor Response Profile by Pearson Chi-square analysis.

Factors n TOTAL (n=205) H&NC (n=34) GC (n=35)
N(ORR)% N(DCR)% N(ORR)% N(DCR)% N(ORR)% N(DCR)%
Total 205 66(32.2) 139(67.8) 19(55.9) 31(91.2) 8(22.9) 19(54.3)
Sex Male 139 48(34.5) 102(73.4) 15(57.7) 26(100.0) 6(25.0) 14(58.3)
Female 66 18(27.3) 37(56.1) 4(50.0) 5(62.5) 2(18.2) 5(45.5)
p* 0.445 0.002 0.187 0.005 0.193 0.028
Age <60y 137 44(32.1) 92(67.2) 12(52.2) 23(100.0) 7(30.4) 13(56.5)
≥60y 68 22(32.4) 47(69.1) 7(63.6) 8(72.7) 1(8.3) 6(50.0)
p* 0.515 0.240 0.220 0.032 0.285 0.863
Histology ADC 140 39(27.9) 90(64.3) 2 (100.0) 2(100.0) 8 (24.2) 18(54.6)
non-ADC 65 27(41.5) 49(75.4) 17 (53.1) 29(90.6) 0(0) 1(50.0)
p* 0.128 0.283 0.432 0.902 0.367 0.471
Treatment lines 1st 40 20(50.0) 30(75.0) 10(55.6) 16(88.9) 3(60.0) 3(60.0)
2nd 81 26(32.1) 57(70.4) 4(44.4) 8(88.9) 4(19.0) 13(61.9)
3rd 41 13(31.7) 25(61.0) 3(100.0) 3(100.0) 1(12.5) 3(37.5)
>3rd 43 7(16.3) 27(62.8) 2(50.0) 4(100.0) 0(0) 0(0)
p* 0.036 0.702 0.683 0.937 0.208 0.345
Nimotuzumab frequency ≤6 73 17(23.3) 39(53.4) 6 (54.6) 9(81.8) 0(0) 3(23.1)
>6 132 49(37.1) 100(75.8) 13 (56.5) 22(95.7) 8(36.4) 16(72.7)
p* 0.050 0.004 0.85 0.335 0.004 0.006
Nimotuzumab doses (mg/w) ≤200 54 20(37.0) 36(66.7) 7 (53.9) 11(84.6) 1 (16.7) 4(66.7)
>200 151 46(30.5) 103(68.2) 12 (57.1) 20(95.2) 7 (24.1) 15(51.7)
p* 0.567 0.436 0.434 0.400 0.181 0.258

n: number of patients who have received at least one evaluation. p: statistical p value.

Bold text indicates statistically significant P-values (<0.05)

*

compared between two groups of each factor.