Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Access. 2016 Jul 7;4:3862–3877. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2587581

TABLE I.

Example 1 - Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR): Comparison of New Method with other standard wavelet denoising methods at 16 and 4 scans. Hard and Soft represent hard and soft thresholding, respectively; dB is SNR in decibels; and DL is Decomposition Level (cf. Figures 38).

Method 16 scans 4 scans

SNR (dB) SNR SSIM DL SNR (dB) SNR SSIM DL

Noisy 35 57 0.9903 - 30 32 0.9684 -
Minimax-Hard 43 146 0.9959 7 38 81 0.9880 7
Minimax-Soft 46 201 0.9954 7 41 114 0.9890 12
SUREShrink-Hard 38 82 0.9938 9 32 41 0.9779 9
SUREShrink-Soft 44 157 0.9966 7 37 77 0.9905 12
Zhao [9] 46 209 0.9821 6 38 80 0.9790 6
Poornachandra [38] 44 167 0.9825 6 37 73 0.9803 6
Zhang [39] 46 209 0.9821 6 38 80 0.9778 6
Lin [37] 44 167 0.9825 6 38 79 0.9800 6
New Method 73 4438 0.9969 6 64 1567 0.9957 6