Table 3.
Study | Comparison | % Change in Performance (90% CI) | Cohen's d | Pearson's r | Statistical Inference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ghosh et al. (17) | 1. 60g sago porridge vs. flavour-matched placebo | 34 (18 to 68) | 1.1 | 0.5 | Large, Major |
2. 53g sago porridge + 15 g soy isolate vs. flavour-matched placebo | 84 (44 to 40) | 2.0 | 0.7 | Large, Major | |
Che Jusoh et al. (19) | 3. 63g sago porridge 1h before exercise vs. fluid-matched control | 1 (−2 to 3) | 0.0 | 0.0 | Very Small, Trivial |
4. 63g sago gel during exercise vs. fluid-matched control | 1 (−2 to 1) | 0.1 | 0.0 | Very Small, Trivial | |
Che Jusoh et al. (20) | 5. 56g sago porridge post-exercise feeding 2h prior to second bout vs. fluid-matched control | 4 (0 to 7) | 0.2 | 0.1 | Small, Minor |
Notes: CI, confidence interval; statistical inference of % change in performance due to sago from d and r based on Cohen.61