Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2016 Aug 4;13(11):2221–2227. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.010

Table 1.

Linear regression results between the electromechanical and the electrical activation times in six canines during epicardial and endocardial pacing as well as during sinus rhythm.

Dog #1 Dog #2 Dog #3 Dog #4 Dog #5 Dog #6 Mean value
Epicardial lateral pacing R=0.87***
s=3.6
i=19ms
R=0.80***
s=2.5
i=12ms
R=0.91***
s=1.6
i=24ms
R=0.94***
s=1.9
i=47ms
R=0.47***
s=1.9
i=39ms
R=0.89***
s=1.5
i=34ms
R=0.79
s=2.2
i=29ms
Epicardial anterior pacing N.A. R=0.76***
s=1.5
i=54ms
R=0.63***
s=1.7
i=31ms
R=0.89***
s=2.3
i=16ms
R=0.88***
s=2.3
i=13 ms
R=0.80***
s=1.4
i=44 ms
R=0.81
s=1.8
i=32ms
Endocardial pacing R=0.84***
s=1.9
i=47ms
R=0.74***
s=1.8
i=22ms
R=0.63***
s=1.6
i=33ms
N.A. R=0.61***
s=0.9
i=52ms
R=0.61***
s=0.9
i=50ms
R=0.69
s=1.4
i=41 ms
Sinus rhythm R=0.61***
s=2.7
i=34ms
R=0.43***
s=1.2
i=23ms
R=0.76***
s=2.4
i=60ms
R=0.78***
s=2.1
i=40ms
R=0.39**
s=2.7
i=33ms
R=0.41**
s=1.9
i=46ms
R=0.56
s=2.2
i=39ms

The table indicates for each case the correlation coefficient (R), the slope (s) and the intercept (i) of the regression. In two cases, the data were not available (N.A.).

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001