Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Perinatol. 2016 Aug 25;36(11):966–971. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.131

Table 3.

Severe ROP regression models – SpO2

90% threshold
Wald Z statistic P value VIF
EGA −2.34 0.02* 2.93
BW centile −1.36 0.17 1.81
Male sex −0.25 0.80 1.87
Caucasian race 1.25 0.21 1.33
Complete antenatal steroid treatment 1.50 0.13 1.87
Antenatal magnesium exposure 0.59 0.55 1.88
Vaginal delivery −1.79 0.07 2.36
Inotrope exposure 2.16 0.03* 2.87
BPD 0.45 0.65 1.01
Mean % FiO2 −0.70 0.48 2.07
Hyperoxia burden 0.99 0.32 3.51
Model: R2=0.68, p<0.01*
93% threshold
Wald Z statistic P value VIF
EGA −2.36 0.01* 1.47
BW centile −1.30 0.19 1.89
Male sex −0.17 0.87 1.90
Caucasian race 1.42 0.15 1.32
Complete antenatal steroid treatment 1.59 0.11 1.88
Antenatal magnesium exposure 0.45 0.65 1.75
Vaginal delivery −1.61 0.10 1.98
Inotrope exposure 2.18 0.03* 2.16
BPD 0.45 0.65 1.01
Mean % FiO2 −0.88 0.37 2.06
Hyperoxia burden 0.88 0.37 2.37
Model: R2=0.68, p<0.01*
95% threshold
Wald Z statistic P value VIF
EGA −2.36 0.02* 2.23
BW centile −1.20 0.22 1.80
Male sex −0.22 0.82 1.87
Caucasian race 1.45 0.14 1.32
Complete antenatal steroid treatment 1.60 0.10 1.82
Antenatal magnesium exposure 0.36 0.72 1.66
Vaginal delivery −1.52 0.12 2.01
Inotrope exposure 2.12 0.03* 1.96
BPD 0.45 0.65 1.01
Mean % FiO2 −0.96 0.33 2.10
Hyperoxia burden 0.68 0.49 2.05
Model: R2=0.67, p<0.01*
*

Denotes significance at p ≤ 0.05.