Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jul 14;43(1):28–44. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24997

TABLE 1.

Recommended RT-MRI Protocols for Speech Imaging

Recommended protocols Protocol 1 Protocol 2 Protocol 3 Protocol 4
Accessibility Widely available on most commercial scanners Custom implementation Custom implementation Custom implementation
Key advantages Compatible with linear reconstruction schemes, which enables on-the-fly reconstruction, a feature beneficial for frequently updating scan planes, and diagnosis, & correction for artifacts on the fly
Motion robust spiral readouts Motion robust radial readouts High temporal resolution
Compatible with iterative offline reconstruction schemes
Enables high spatiotemporal resolutions (eg, up to 1.5–2.5mm2; 10–50 ms/frame)
Speech tasks
 On-line visualization (also see Fig 1 for spatiotemporal resolutions requirements)
Sustained sounds
Velo-pharyngeal closure
Bulk tongue movements
Sustained sounds
Velopharyngeal closure
Bulk tongue and few rapid tongue movements (eg, consonant to vowel)
Parts of consonant constriction sounds
Speech tasks:
 Off-line visualization (also see Fig 1 for spatiotemporal resolutions requirements)
Sustained sounds
Velopharyngeal closure
Most rapid tongue movements
Consonant constriction sounds
Coarticulation events
Receiver coil In order of preference (Also see Fig. 2):
Custom upper airway coil
Head and neck coil
Neurovascular coil
Head coil
FOV 20 × 20 to 30 × 30 cm (dependent on the coil geometry)
Orientation Dependent on speech task; Mid-sagittal for most tasks
Slice thickness 5–10 mm
Field strength 1.5 T or 3T 1.5 T 1.5 T (preferred)
3T
1.5 T
3 T (preferred)
Sampling Cartesian Spiral Radial Specialized (Spiral + Cartesian)
Sequence GRE or SSFP GRE GRE GRE
Example sequence parameters SSFP 3T
FA: 15°, TE/TR: 1.1/2.3 msec,
GRE3T
FA: 30°, TE/TR: 1.0/2.2 msec
TR = 6 msec, FA = 15°, spiral readout length = 2.4 msec 1.5 T
TE/TR: 1.44/2.2 ms, FA = 5°
At3T
Spiral FLASH
TE/TR = 0.85/9.8 ms
Cartesian FLASH TE/TR = 2.3/9.8 ms
Specifications of the sampling pattern Cartesian subsampling (2–3 fold) Incoherent repetition of short spiral interleaves along time Incoherent repetition of radial readouts along time Temporal navigation by short spiral readouts. Randomized Cartesian sub-sampling for imaging data
On-the-fly reconstruction Parallel Imaging, Partial Fourier Gridding combined with sliding window (x)
Offline reconstruction Iterative constrained reconstruction Eg, spatial-spectral sparsity, spatiotemporal finite difference sparsity, low rank constraints (x)
Figures demonstrating quality and expected artifacts Figs. 35 Figs. 59 Figs. (5 and 10) Fig. 11

The various speech tasks that can be captured by the recommended four protocols are classified based on the latency in visualization (on-the-fly versus off-line). Protocol 1 can be enabled by Cartesian sequences, which are widely available on commercial scanners. Protocols 2, 3 are based on non-Cartesian sampling trajectories, and provide options for both on-the-fly and off-line reconstructions. Protocol 4 relies on special sampling schemes, and is based on offline reconstruction. On-the-fly reconstructions allow for real-time visualization of the speech events, and provide flexibility in prescription of planes, diagnosis of artifacts. In comparison to on-the-fly reconstructions, off-line iterative constrained reconstructions offer capabilities of imaging at high spatiotemporal resolutions. As discussed in the text, careful prescriptions of these protocols are required to avoid some common artifacts.