Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;188(11):640. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5647-y

Table 7.

Comparison of thallium determination results in different environmental samples with the use of inversion voltammetry techniques (Griepink et al. 1998)

Sample Electrolyte Type of electrode used in the voltammetric technique Electrolysis parameters Interference Detection limit [ng∙L−1]
Natural water pH 4.8; EDTA HMDE—hanging mercury drop electrode −0.9 V/SCE Bi, Cu, Sb 0.5
Natural water pH 4.5; octane
EDTA
MFE—mercury-film electrode −0.8 V/Ag/AgCl Cd, Pb, Cu 0.011
Sea water EDTA MFE—mercury-film electrode −1.1 V Cd, Pb 40
Sea water pH 3.5; KNO3 MFE—mercury-film electrode −0.9 V/SCE Pb, Cu 0.6
Sea water KNO3/EDTA MFE—mercury-film electrode −1.2 V/Ag/AgCl Cu, Pb, Cd, Zn, Bi, Co, Ni, Sn, Fe
Rocks pH 7–8; citrate
EDTA
HMDE—hanging mercury drop electrode −0.75/SCE Requires separation
Salts pH 4.5; EDTA HMDE—hanging mercury drop electrode −0.6/SCE Cu, Pb, Cd, Bi, Sb, Sn 200