Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;29(6):871–879. doi: 10.1007/s40620-016-0344-z

Table 5.

Papers published regarding clinical experiences in incrPD

Author, year Period of time Study design No. pts on incrPD incrPD schedule Initial GFR (ml/min) Time on incrPD (patient-months) Peritonitis rate (episode/patient-months) Results/outcomes
Williams, 1999 [14] NA Pilot study 15 CAPD
1 dwell/day
9.8 ± 1.9 90 1/30 Adequacy (good)
Hospitalization (3 admissions)
Survival (patients and technique)
De Vecchi et al., 2000 [15] 1995–1999 Pilot prospective, not controlled 25 CAPD
1–2 dwells/day
6–10 262 1/21 Good rehabilitation with incrPD
Better quality of life with incrPD
Adequacy (good)
Exit-site infections (8 episodes)
Complications
Hospitalization (3 days/year)
Survival (patients and technique)
Burkart et al., 2000 [7] 1997–1999 Non randomized, prospective 13 CAPD
1–3 dwells/day
6.7 ± 2.4 159 1/53 Adequacy (good)
Complications
Survival (patients and technique)
Foggensteiner et al., 2002 [8] 1997–2000 Pilot, not randomized, prospective 39 CAPD
1 dwell/day
10 422 1/30 Adequacy (good)
Complications
Hospitalization (3.6 days/year)
Survival (patients and technique)
Neri et al., 2003 [16] 2000–2001 Preliminary experience 5 APD 3–4 sessions/week 7–9 84 none Adequacy
Peritonitis
Compliance
Complications
Survival (patients and technique)
Viglino et al., 2008 [27] 2004–2007 Retrospective 11 CAPD
2 dwells/day
7.3 ± 2.7 106 NA Choice of dialysis modality
RRF and adequacy (good)
Technique survival
Domenici et al., 2011 [28] 2000–2008 Retrospective 17 ? 6.9 ± 1.1 480 1/48 Reduced rate of loss of RRF
Jeloka et al., 2013 [29] 2006–2011 Retrospective 13 CAPD
1 dwell/day
7.8 ± 2.6 244 1/56 Adequacy (good)
Barràs Sans et al., 2016 [30] 2003–2012 Retrospective 46 CAPD
3 dwells/day
8.0 ± 3.2 1035 1/99 Reduced rate of loss of RRF
Reduced dose of erythropoietin

APD automated peritoneal dialysis, CAPD continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. For other abbreviations, see previous tables