Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 25;355:i5351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5351

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with tibial fractures allocated to treatment with low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) or sham treatment. Figures are numbers (percentage) of participants unless stated otherwise

LIPUS (n=250) Sham (n=251) Total (n=501)
Mean (SD) age (years) 37.1 (13.2) 39.1 (14.6) 38.1 (13.9)
Women 81 (32) 75 (30) 156 (31)
Men 169 (68) 176 (70) 345 (69)
Employed before injury 184 (74) 184 (73) 368 (74)
Mechanism of injury:
 Motor vehicle crash 25 (10) 14 (6) 39 (8)
 Motor vehicle crash (pedestrian) 28 (11) 30 (12) 58 (12)
 Motorcycle crash 25 (10) 35 (14) 60 (12)
 Crush injury 7 (3) 5 (2) 12 (2)
 Fall 84 (34) 87 (35) 171 (34)
 Twist 25 (10) 20 (8) 45 (9)
 Direct trauma (penetrating) 0 4 (2) 4 (18)
 Direct trauma (blunt) 43 (17) 33 (13) 76 (15)
 Other 13 (5) 23 (9) 36 (7)
Current smoker 79 (32) 86 (34) 165 (33)
Diabetes*:
 Any 11 (4) 19 (8) 30 (6)
 Insulin dependent 7 (3) 8 (3) 15 (3)
 Non-insulin dependent 4 (2) 11 (4) 15 (3)
Fracture:
 Open 58 (23) 56 (22) 114 (23)
 Closed 192 (77) 195 (78) 387 (77)
Gustilo classification for open fractures (% of all patients):
 I 26 (10) 25 (10) 51 (10)
 II 15 (6) 19 (8) 34 (7)
 IIIA 15 (6) 11 (4) 26 (5)
 IIIB 2 (1) 1 (<1) 3 (1)
Tscherne classification for closed fractures (% of all patients):
 0 64 (26) 62 (25) 126 (25)
 1 110 (44) 110 (44) 220 (44)
 2 16 (6) 20 (8) 36 (7)
 3 2 (1) 3 (1) 5 (1)
Type of fracture*:
 Comminuted 57 (23) 67 (27) 124 (25)
 Transverse 64 (26) 55 (22) 119 (24)
 Oblique 77 (31) 77 (31) 154 (31)
 Segmental 6 (2) 2 (1) 8 (2)
 Spiral 82 (33) 95 (38) 177 (35)
Type of fixation†:
 Nail with previous reaming 249 (100) 249 (99) 498 (>99)
 Nail without previous reaming 0 2 (1) 2 (<1)
Adjudicated postoperative fracture gap‡ 10 (4) 5 (2) 15 (3)

*Categories not mutually exclusive.

†n=500 (249 and 251).

‡n=494 (245 and 249).