Skip to main content
editorial
. 2016 Aug;97:263–265. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.06.006

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Comparison of sinotrial pacemaker cells and chamber myocytes. (A) Morphological comparison of a SAN myocyte (phase contrast) and a ventricular myocyte, which was immunochemically stained for Ryr2 expression. Bar represents 25 μm. (B) Comparison of the action potentials of a SAN myocyte (left) and a ventricular myocyte (right). (C) Transcriptional network, which determines SAN development. Panel C was adapted from [15].