Table 2. Synteny with strawberry.
| Rose linkage group (ICM) |
Fragaria vesca pseudochromosome |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fv1 | Fv2 | Fv3 | Fv4 | Fv5 | Fv6 | Fv7 | |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 47 |
| 2 | 160 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 155 | 4 |
| 3 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 132 | 0 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 173 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 166 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | 195 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 114 | 1 | 0 |
Number of markers of the three garden rose SNP linkage maps that could be placed on the Fragaria vesca pseudochromosomes. For this, the rose sequence contigs from which the SNPs had been derived were BLASTed to the F. vesca genome sequence v2.0 with wordlength 11, and the best hit was used if above the cutoff E-value of 10−5, otherwise they were considered not mapped. In bold are the groups of markers that represent the most likely syntenous linkage groups.