Table 3.

Regression analysis of TES at 12 months

	Correlation (n≤208)		Model 1, n=193, adjusted R 2=0.179 F(6, 186)=7.995, p<0.001				Model 2, n=193, adjusted R 2=0.503 F(11, 181)=18.698, p<0.001
Variable	r	p	B	SE B	β	p	B	SE B	β	p
Constant			17.228	1.152		<0.001	8.267	1.040		<0.001
Foreign language spoken	0.145	0.018	0.580	0.606	0.065	0.340	0.168	0.476	0.019	0.724
AD in last 10 years	0.222	0.001	4.219	1.282	0.216	0.001	−0.208	1.088	−0.011	0.849
Episiotomy	0.185	0.004	3.687	1.770	0.147	0.039	1.492	1.401	0.059	0.288
Number of medical sinterventions	0.194	0.002	0.366	0.339	0.077	0.282	0.236	0.269	0.050	0.380
General anaesthesia	0.216	0.001	3.550	1.700	0.141	0.038	1.731	1.372	0.069	0.209
WDEQ	0.304	<0.001	0.054	0.015	0.246	<0.001	0.008	0.012	0.038	0.504
TES t2	0.701	<0.001					0.483	0.070	0.532	<0.001
EPDS t2	0.492	<0.001					0.040	0.085	0.040	0.633
GHQ t2	0.490	<0.001					0.092	0.072	0.103	0.205
Satisfaction with physical state t2	−0.292	<0.001					0.023	0.211	0.006	0.915
Pain t2	0.359	<0.001					0.898	0.421	0.122	0.034

AD=antidepressant; WDEQ=Wijma Delivery Experience Questionnaire; TES=Traumatic Event Scale; EPDS=Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; GHQ=General Health Questionnaire 12 item version. Significant p values are given in bold script.