Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 22;29(11):477–484. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzw028

Table II.

RMSDs of the CDR-H3 models versus the X-ray crystal structure

Models PMFa (kcal/mol) Backbone RMSDb (Å) All atoms RMSDc (Å)
Model a 0.00 3.89 5.02
Model b 1.13 3.24 4.27
Model c 1.46 1.65 2.75
Model d 0.43 1.59 2.68
Model e 0.92 2.24 3.13
Initiald e 3.90 4.87
AMA-II model1f 1.59 3.69 5.16
AMA-II model2f 1.39 3.34 4.62
AMA-II model3f 2.69 3.74 4.78
AMA-II model4f 2.98 3.69 5.07
AMA-II model5f 1.54 3.42 5.03
X-ray structure in chain B 2.22 0.00 0.00
X-ray structure in chain D 3.28 0.35 1.78

aPMF values of the models and X-ray structure on the free energy landscape in Fig. 1. The reference is the PMF of model a.

bThe RMSD values of the backbone heavy atoms of the CDR-H3 loop in each model with reference to the X-ray crystal structure (chain B), where the Cα atoms in the residues other than the CDR-H3 loop from ArgH93 to TyrH102 were superimposed to the crystal structure (chain B).

cThe RMSD values of the all heavy atoms of the CDR-H3 loop in each model with reference to the X-ray crystal structure (chain B), where the Cα atoms in the residues other than the CDR-H3 loop from ArgH93 to TyrH102 were superimposed to the crystal structure (chain B).

dThe initial model as the Stage 1 result of AMA-II for the current McMD simulations.

eThe initial structure was not sampled by the current simulation, and it is out of the free energy landscape.

fThe Stage 2 models of AMA-II by the McMD computations.