Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 26.
Published in final edited form as: Biosens Bioelectron. 2008 Oct 1;24(7):1843–1849. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.09.019

Table 1.

Summary of electrode performance and comparison with PVC ISEs.

Experiment Electrode type Slope
[mV/log]
Linear Range
[log(K+)]
LOD
[log(K+)]
Response Time
[sec]
Comparison PVC ISE 44.4±1.8 −5.5 ±0.1~ −1.3±0.3 −5.5±0.1 9±1.2
of Standard
PVC ISE
350µm Teflon®
aperture
35.1±4.4 −4.5±0.3 ~ −0.3±0.1 −4.4±0.3 16±1.5
to BLM 40 µm SU-8 aperture 20.1±0.6 −5.0±0.1 ~ −0.3±0.1 −5.3±0.1 14±3
ISEs 660 nm silicon aperture 15.8±0.1 −5.5±0.5 ~ −0.2±0.1 −5.3±0.3 20±3.4

0.1% ionophore 7.00±0.1 −5.0±1.0 ~−0.5±0.3 −4.7±0.3 20±5.1
Comparison of 0.5% ionophore 18.8±1.7 −4.5±0.5 ~ −0.3±0.1 −4.5±0.2 20±4.7
BLM Ionophore 1.0% ionophore 20.1±0.6 −5.0±0.1 ~ −0.3±0.1 −5.3±0.1 14±3
Concentrations(a) 4.0% ionophore 18.9±0.9 −6.5±0.5 ~ −0.2±0.1 −6.5±0.1 15±2.7
8.0% ionophore 19.1±1.1 −5.5±0.5 ~ −0.2±0.1 −6.2±0.2 16±2.5
(a)

With a SU-8 aperture of 40 µm in diameter.