Table 2.
Informal | Formal | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
AOR | p Value | AOR | p Value | AOR | p Value | OR | p Value | |
Women's empowerment characteristics | ||||||||
Educational attainment | 1.02 | .073 | 1.04 | .364 | ||||
Wealth | 1.01 | .807 | 0.96 | .736 | ||||
Any media exposure | 1.06 | .422 | 0.83 | .517 | ||||
Relationship level | ||||||||
Husband's educational attainment | 0.99 | .183 | 1.02 | .615 | ||||
Husband has more education | 1.03 | .740 | 1.04 | .916 | ||||
Age difference (husband age – wife age) | 0.98** | .003 | 1.02 | .477 | ||||
Early marriage (<18 years old) | 0.93 | .230 | 1.05 | .837 | ||||
No. of husband's control issues | 1.17*** | .000 | 1.45*** | .000 | ||||
Wife tolerates wife-beating (any reason) | 0.96 | .489 | 0.69 | .131 | ||||
No. of ways wife can move freely | 1.07** | .006 | 1.28* | .015 | ||||
Wife participates in decision making | 1.08 | .448 | 8.22** | .007 | ||||
Has her money for own use | 0.97 | .630 | 0.89 | .632 | ||||
State level | ||||||||
% of women who tolerate IPV | 1.22** | .004 | 1.38 | .140 | ||||
% of women who experience IPV | 1.01 | .294 | 0.99 | .378 | ||||
Gender Development Index | 0.93 | .149 | 1.39* | .029 | ||||
Gender Empowerment Measure | 1.23*** | .000 | 0.62*** | .001 |
Note. Adjusted for age, total number of children, religion, urban residence, employment, family history of abuse, daughter-in-law status and household education, and severity of violence, which were all not significant at p < .05, with the exception of women who were of “other/none” religion who were more likely than Hindu women to seek help from informal sources (OR = 1.7, p = .001). Older women were more likely (OR = 1.05, p = .003) and Muslims were less likely (AOR = 0.24, p = .030) to seek help from institutions. AOR = adjusted odds ratio; OR = odds ratio; IPV = intimate partner violence.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.