. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Interpers Violence. 2015 Dec 9;33(9):1519–1548. doi: 10.1177/0886260515618945

Table 3.

Results of Interactions of Relation-Level Empowerment Measures and State-Level Characteristics.

	Interaction
Model 3.	AOR	p Value
Help from informal sources
GEM × Educational Attainment	1.01	.553
GEM × Age Difference	0.99	.108
GEM × Control Issues	1.02	.495
GEM × Freedom of Movement	1.04	.176
State-Level Tolerance of IPV × Age Difference	1.00	.610
State-Level Tolerance of IPV × Control Issues	1.05	.080
State-Level Tolerance of IPV × Freedom of Movement	1.03	.340
Help from formal sources
GEM × Control Issues	1.13	.186
GEM× Decision Making	0.01^*	.039
State-Level Tolerance of IPV × Control Issues	1.03	.720
State-Level Tolerance of IPV × Decision Making	1.10	.670

Note. AOR = adjusted odds ratio; GEM = Gender Empowerment Measure; IPV = intimate partner violence.

p < .05.

^aAdjusted for all covariates in Model 2 aside from those shown in the left column.