Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 13;2016:1024709. doi: 10.1155/2016/1024709

Table 3.

Summary of meta-analysis of all included studies and subgroup analysis.

Comparison Sensitivity Specificity LR (+)
All included studies 87.3% (CI 80–89%; i 2 = 22.86%) 99% (CI 99-100%; i 2 = 6.69%) 60.66 (CI 25.27–145.60; i 2 = 3.42%)
EBUS + EUS 85% (CI 80–89%; i 2 = 22.86%) 99.6% (CI 98.5–100%; i 2 = 6.69%) 60.66 (CI 25.27–145.6; i 2 = 3.42%)
EBUS + EUS-B-FNA 88% (CI 83.1–91.4%; i 2 = 25.64%) 100% (CI 99-100%; i 2 = 0%) 87.67 (CI 28.35–271.07; i 2 = 1.85%)

LR (+): positive likelihood ratio.