Table 4.

PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2) scores of trial domains

	Domain	Score	Rationale
1	Eligibility criteria	3	P: inclusion of patients with gait disorders whatever the etiology
			E: focus on acute to subacute patients in first phase of rehabilitation
2	Recruitment path	4	P: recruitment of participants through usual clinical care at admission
			E: specific procedures to assess eligibility (3 weeks of monitoring)
3	Setting	3	P: study takes place in a neurorehabilitation unit
			E: single-center trial in a high-income country
4	Organization intervention	5	P: resources, provider expertise, and organization of care delivery in both study arms are similar to usual care
5	Flexibility of experimental intervention: delivery	5	P: identical flexibility to usual care
6	Flexibility of experimental intervention: adherence	5	P: no more than usual encouragement to adhere to the intervention
7	Follow-up	4	P: assessment of outcomes through usual clinical care
			E: specific procedure for follow-up after discharge
8	Outcome	5	P: outcomes are of obvious importance to participants and caregivers
9	Analysis	5	P: intention-to-treat analysis with all available data

Score: 1 Very explanatory; 2 Rather explanatory; 3 Equally pragmatic/explanatory; 4 Rather pragmatic; 5 Very pragmatic. P pragmatic, E explanatory