Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Artif Intell Med. 2016 Jul 27;72:42–55. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.07.001

Table 18.

Top: The tp, fp, tn, fn rates and the counts of tp, fp, tn, fn of the DBN for each screen respectively. The thresholds used for each screening were 0.04, 0.21 and 0.25 for screen 1,2 and 3 respectively. Bottom:

Naïve Bayes
Screen 1 Screen 2 Screen 3
Rates 0.927 (tp)
0.392 (fp)
0.073 (fn)
0.608 (tn)
0.871 (tp)
0.170 (fp)
0.129 (fn)
0.830 (tn)
0.833 (tp)
0.096 (fp)
0.167 (fn)
0.904 (tn)
Counts 51 (tp)
134 (fp)
4 (fn)
208 (tn)
27 (tp)
50 (fp)
4 (fn)
244 (tn)
35 (tp)
24 (fp)
7 (fn)
227 (tn)