Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 8;12:2005–2011. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.12.187

Table 1.

Reaction optimisation and comparison with existing solvents.a

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-12-2005-i001.jpg

Entry Reaction conditions 3a (%)b

1 0.1 M, Et3N (3 equiv), 20 °C, 5 h 94
2 0.3 M, Et3N (3 equiv), 20 °C, 5 h 98
3 0.5 M, Et3N (3 equiv), 20 °C, 5 h 100
4 0.5 M, K3PO4 (3 equiv), 20 °C, 5 h c
5 0.5 M, Cs2CO3 (3 equiv), 20 °C, 5 h c
7 0.5 M, Et3N (1.1 equiv), 20 °C, 5 h 98
8 0.5 M, Et3N (1.1 equiv), 30 °C, 1 h 96
9d 0.5 M, Et3N (1.1 equiv), 30 °C, 1 h 81
10e 0.5 M, Et3N (1.1 equiv), 30 °C, 1 h 87

a1 (1 equiv, 0.25 mmol), 2 (1.05 equiv, 0.26 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (2 mol %), CuI (4 mol %), base (see table), Cyrene, temperature (see table), time (see table), N2. bIsolated yield. cReaction mixture solidified, product was not isolated. dTHF used as solvent. eDMF used as solvent.