Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;29(10):2010–2021. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12924

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Experiment 3: Mating responses to rivals under reciprocal variation of yeast (Y) and sucrose (S). (a) Boxplots of mating latency (plotted on logarithmic scale) as a function of diet and male rival presence. Final latency sample sizes for ‘no rivals’, ‘rivals’ males were 100% Y: 100% S = 39, 39; 100% Y: 0% S = 36, 38; 0% Y: 100% S = 38, 34; 0% Y: 0% S = 37, 36. (b) Boxplots of mating duration as a function of diet and male rival presence. Final duration sample sizes for ‘no rivals’, ‘rivals’ males were 100% Y: 100% S = 39, 39; 100% Y: 0% S = 36, 38; 0% Y: 100% S = 38, 34; 0% Y: 0% S = 37, 36. Boxplots as in Fig. 1. Significant planned contrasts: *< 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001.