Skip to main content
. 2016 May 25;34(4):538–554. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12148

Table 3.

Zero‐order associations between variables

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
1. Depression 1
2. Anxiety LI: .7***
AMP: .7***
1
3. Emotional health composite LI: .9***
AMP: .9***
LI: .9***
AMP: .9***
1
4. Available support LI: −.1NS
AMP: .2NS
LI: .0NS
AMP: .3**
LI: −.1NS
AMP: .3*
1
5. Number of problems last 6 months LI: .4**
AMP: .5***
LI: .3**
AMP: .4***
LI: .4***
AMP: .5***
LI: .1NS
AMP: .1NS
1
6. Organized support LI: .3**
AMP: .5***
LI: .2*
AMP: .3**
LI: .3**
AMP: .5***
LI: .2NS
AMP: .2NS
LI: .4***
AMP: .6***
1
7. Community integration LI: −.2*
AMP: −.3**
LI: −.3*
AMP: −.2*
LI: −.3*
AMP: −.3*
LI: .0NS
AMP: −.1NS
LI: −.3*
AMP: −.2*
LI: −.3*
AMP: −.0NS
1
8. Other‐perceived support LI: .1NS
AMP: .3**
LI: .2NS
AMP: .2NS
LI: .1NS
AMP: .3*
LI: −.3**
AMP: .0NS
LI: −.1NS
AMP: .3**
LI: −.1NS
AMP: .3**
LI: −.1NS
AMP: −.1NS
1
9. Support received from nominee LI: .1NS
AMP: .4***
LI: .1NS
AMP: .3**
LI: .1NS
AMP: .4***
LI: −.2*
AMP: .1NS
LI: −.0NS
AMP: .4***
LI: −.0NS
AMP: .2NS
LI: −.0NS
AMP: −.1NS
LI: .6***
AMP: .4***
1
10. Self‐efficacy LI: −.4***
AMP: −.5***
LI: −.4**
AMP: −.3*
LI: −.4***
AMP: −.4***
LI: .1NS
AMP: .1NS
LI: .1NS
AMP: −.3**
LI: −.1NS
AMP: −.3**
LI: .3*
AMP: .2NS
LI: −.2*
AMP: −.3***
LI: −.3*
AMP: −.3**
1
11. Language ability LI: −.2*
AMP: −.1NS
LI: −.1NS
AMP: −.0NS
LI: −.2NS
AMP: −.1NS
LI: .0NS
AMP: .0NS
LI: .1NS
AMP: .1NS
LI: .2NS
AMP: .0NS
LI: −.2NS
AMP: .2NS
LI: −.3**
AMP: −.2*
LI: −.4***
AMP: −.1NS
LI: .2*
AMP: .1NS
1
12. Non‐verbal ability LI: −.2NS
AMP: −.2NS
LI: −.2NS
AMP: .0NS
LI: −.2NS
AMP: −.1NS
LI: .1NS
AMP: .2NS
LI: .2NS
AMP: .2NS
LI: .1NS
AMP: .0NS
LI: −.3*
AMP: −.0NS
LI: −.4***
AMP: −.1NS
LI: −.4***
AMP: .1NS
LI: .4**
AMP: .2*
LI: .5***
AMP: .3**

AMP = age‐matched peer; LI = language impairment; NS = not significant.

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.