Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 7;8(6):485–505. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1356

Table 1.

Material Properties, Applied Mechanical Stimuli, and Resulting Findings From Selected Mechanoregulation Studies

Authors Application Material Properties Stimuli Outcome
Huiskes et al.55 Tissue differentiation Bone: E = 4590, k = 3.7e−13; fibrous tissue (initial cond.): E = 2, k = 1.0e−14 Fluid/solid velocity, shear strain Tissue differentiation sequences in agreement with those found experimentally
Lacroix and Prendergast56 Tissue differentiation Granulation tissue: E = 0.2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; fibrous tissue: E = 2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; cartilage: E = 10, k = 5e−15, ν = 0.167, S bm = 3400, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; marrow: E = 2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; immature bone: E = 1000, k = 1e−13, ν = 0.3, S bm = 13920, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; mature bone: E = 6000, k = 3.7e−13, ν = 0.3, S bm = 13920, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; cortical bone: E = 20,000, k = 1e−17, ν = 0.3, S bm = 13920, F bm = 2300, n = 0.04 Fluid/solid velocity, shear strain Cell diffusion rate is a key parameter for healing speed
Geris et al.57 Tissue differentiation Granulation tissue: E = 1, ν = 0.17, k = 1e−14; cartilage: E = 10, ν = 0.17, k = 5e−15; bone: E = 1000, ν = 0.3, k = 1e−13 Fluid/solid velocity, shear strain Successful prediction of tissue differentiation in a rabbit bone chamber
Heegaard et al.58 Joint morphogenesis Cartilage: E = 1.0, ν = 0.4; tendons: E L = 3.0, E T = 0.1, ν L = ν T = 0.2, G = 1.0 Hydrostatic stress Prediction of congruent surfaces within the joint region
Shefelbine and Carter59 Growth front progression Newly formed bone: E = 500, ν = 0.2; cartilage: G = 2, ν = 0.49 Hydrostatic stress, octahedral shear Successful prediction of normal and abnormal loadings on growth front progression
Isaksson et al.60 Bone regeneration Cortical bone: E = 15,750, k = 1e−17, ν = 0.325, S bm = 17,660, F bm = 2300, n = 0.04; marrow: E = 2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; granulation tissue: E = 1, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; fibrous tissue: E = 2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; cartilage: E = 10, k = 5e−15, ν = 0.167, S bm = 3400, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; immature bone: E = 1000, k = 1e−13, ν = 0.325, S bm = 17660, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; mature bone: E = 6000, k = 3.7e−13, ν = 0.325, S bm = 17660, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8 Fluid/solid velocity, shear strain Prediction of spatial and temporal tissue distributions observed in distraction osteogenesis experiments
Garcia‐Aznar et al.61 Tissue growth/differentiation Periosteum (initial cond.): E = 35.3, ν = 0.048; endosteum (initial cond.): E = 35.3, ν = 0.048; gap: E = 8.2, ν = 0.048 Second invariant of the deviatoric strain tensor Correct prediction of callus size in the presence of interfragmentary movements
Giorgi et al.62 Joint morphogenesis Cartilage: E = 1.1, ν = 0.49; synovial capsule: E = 0.287 kPa, ν = 0.4 Hydrostatic stress Prediction of interlocking surfaces for hinge and ball and socket joints
Giorgi et al.63 Hip Joint morphogenesis Cartilage: E = 1.1, ν = 0.49 Hydrostatic stress Importance of movements to maintain acetabular depth and femoral head sphericity
Isaksson et al.64 Cell and tissue differentiation Cortical bone: E = 15,750, k = 1e−17, ν = 0.325, S bm = 17,660, F bm = 2300, n = 0.04; marrow: E = 2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; granulation tissue: E = 1, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; fibrous tissue: E = 2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; cartilage: E = 10, k = 5e−15, ν = 0.167, S bm = 3400, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; immature bone: E = 1000, k = 1e−13, ν = 0.325, S bm = 17,660, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8; mature bone: E = 6000, k = 3.7e−13, ν = 0.325, S bm = 17,660, F bm = 2300, n = 0.8 Fluid/solid velocity, shear strain Spatial and temporal predictions of fibrous tissue, cartilage, and bone. Correctly describe fracture healing and disrupted healing
Pérez and Prendergast65 Cell and tissue differentiation Granulation tissue: E = 0.2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, D = 0.8; fibrous tissue: E = 2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, S bm = 2300, D = 0.1; cartilage: E = 10, k = 0.5e−14, ν = 0.3, S bm = 3700, D = 0.05; immature bone: E = 1000, k = 0.1e−14, ν = 0.3, S bm = 13,940, D = 0.01; cortical bone: E = 17,000, k = 0.001e−14, ν = 0.3, S bm = 13,920 Fluid/solid velocity, shear strain Qualitative agreement with experimental data on bone tissue distribution at the bone–implant interface
Burke and Kelly66 Cell differentiation Granulation tissue: E = 0.2, k = 1e−11, ν = 0.167, μ = 1e−9, n = 0.8; fibrous tissue: E = 2, k = 1e−11, ν = 0.167, μ = 1e−9, n = 0.8; cartilage: E = 10, k = 5e−15, ν = 0.167, μ = 1e−9, n = 0.8; marrow: E = 2, k = 1e−14, ν = 0.167, μ = 1e−9, n = 0.8; immature bone: E = 1000, k = 1e−13, ν = 0.3, μ = 1e−9, n = 0.8; mature bone: E = 6000, k = 3.7e−13, ν = 0.3, μ = 1e−9, n = 0.8; cortical bone: E = 20,000, k = 1e−17, ν = 0.3, μ = 1e−9, n = 0.04 Substrate stiffness, oxygen tension Good agreement with results in fracture repair experiments

E is Young's modulus (MPa), k is permeability (m4/N s), G is shear modulus (MPa), μ is fluid dynamic viscosity (N s/m2), S bm is solid bulk modulus (MPa), F bm is fluid bulk modulus (MPa), D is diffusion coefficient (mm2/iter), n is porosity, and υ is Poisson's ratio.