Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Nat Prod. 2009 Apr;72(4):769–771. doi: 10.1021/np800541k

Table 1.

Permeation Data from Pure Forskolin (1)-Treated Human Skin (1, n = 7), P. barbatus Extract-Treated Human Skin (n = 3), Pure 1-Treated Guinea Pig Skin (1, n = 4), and P. barbatus Extract-Treated Guinea Pig Skin (n = 4)

treatment 24 h skin concentration (μmol/g)a 24 h cumulative amount (nmol) flux (nmol/cm2/h)a flux enhancement lag time (h)
pure 1-treated human skin 20.0 ± 10.6b   3.8 ± 1.0   0.18 ± 0.04c,d 1.5 ± 0.6
P. barbatus extract-treated human skin 1.7 ± 1.7b   63.5 ± 10.1  3.6 ± 1.0c,f 20.0 4.8 ± 3.0
pure 1-treated guinea pig skin 5.8 ± 6.4     75.6 ± 31.8   3.4 ± 1.7d,e 2.8 ± 1.8
P. barbatus extract-treated guinea pig skin 2.5 ± 2.9   326.1 ± 76.9 18.5 ± 2.3e,f   5.4 5.5 ± 2.9
a

Student’s t-test was performed on data of 24 h skin concentration and flux of pure 1 vs P. barbatus extract. This test was also performed on data of the same drug treatment on guinea pig skin vs human skin. p-values were calculated between two numbers with the same letter. Levels of significance with different p-values are shown below. All p-values shown are less than 0.001 except for the human skin content of 1 vs P. barbatus extract (p < 0.05).

b

p < 0.05.

c,d,e,f

p < 0.001.