Table 3. Average G-Index, Interproximal Inter G-Index, Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), Visual Plaque Index (VPI), Interproximal VPI, and Calculus Index (CI).
PORTO ALEGRE | TUCUMÁN SANTIAGO | TOTAL | p-value* | p-value** | p-value*** | p-value**** | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(n = 550) | (n = 550) | (n = 550) | (n = 1650) | |||||||||||||||||
Variable | Healthy | GI | Healthy | GI | Healthy | GI | Healthy | GI | ||||||||||||
n=15 | n=535 | n=53 | n=497 | n=5 | n=545 | n=73 | n=1577 | |||||||||||||
mean | SD | mean | SD | mean | SD | mean | SD | mean | SD | mean | SD | mean | SD | mean | SD | |||||
G-Index | 0.44 | 0.05 | 1.12 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 1.11 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 23.4 | 1.73 | 0.28 | 0.37 | 0.12 | 1.33 | 0.44 | 0.000 | 0.424 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Inter G-Index | 0.49 | 0.08 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 1.09 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 1.76 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.13 | 1.35 | 0.43 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
GBI | 3.1 | 3.0 | 22.9 | 18.4 | 0.02 | 2.3 | 23.0 | 19.7 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 74.1 | 23.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 40.6 | 31.9 | 0.000 | 0.408 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
VPI | 35.8 | 18.8 | 70.5 | 18.1 | 29.4 | 12.1 | 73.5 | 20.0 | 44.2 | 21.9 | 81.6 | 18.1 | 31.7 | 14.8 | 75.2 | 19.4 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Inter VPI | 45.1 | 22.5 | 79.0 | 17.1 | 30.0 | 12.5 | 74.0 | 20.3 | 52.4 | 27.1 | 88.9 | 16.0 | 34.6 | 17.7 | 81.2 | 18.8 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
CI | 52.0 | 34.9 | 88.5 | 21.1 | 25.9 | 26.9 | 73.8 | 32.0 | 41.2 | 28.5 | 81.1 | 27.2 | 32.0 | 30.2 | 81.3 | 27.7 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 |
G-Index, Gingival Index; Inter G-Index, Interproximal Gingival Index; GBI, Gingival Bleeding Index; VPI, Visual Plaque Index, Inter VPI, Interproximal Visual Plaque Index; CI, Calculus Index. Mann-Whitney test or Kruskall-Wallis adjusted p-value for significance, as a appropriate, to assess; differences between healthy versus gingival inflammation for all cities (*), prevalence of gingival inflammation Porto Alegre versus Tucumán (**), prevalence of gingival inflammation Porto Alegre versus Santiago (***) and prevalence of gingival inflammation Tucumán versus Santiago (****)