Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep-Oct;24(5):524–534. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720160178

Table 5. Multivariate analyses of factors associated with gingival inflammation (average G-Index ≥0.5). The variables that are statistically for any city or to the total are shown.

TOTAL (n=1650) PORTO ALEGRE (n=550) TUCUMÁN (n=550) SANTIAGO (n=550)
Variables OR CI 95% p-value OR CI 95% p-value OR CI 95% p-value OR CI 95% p-value
Gender Male
Female 1.93 1.03,3.59 0.039 6.48 1.32,31.86 0.021 1.59 0.72,3.53 0.254 0.00 0.00 0.997
Education >12
(years) ≤12 2.18 1.19,4.02 0.012 1.29 0.33,5.06 0.713 3.21 1.46,7.08 0.004 1.88 0.24,15.06 0.550
CI (mean) 18.59 7.13,48.50 0.000 25.66 3.89,169.10 0.001 18.24 5.44,61.19 0.000 36.61 0.099
0.51,2634.86
VPI <30%
≥30% 14.56 6.75,31.40 0.000 10.78 2.06,56.49 0.005 21.10 7.33,60.71 0.000 18.70 1.30,269.52 0.031
City Tucumán
Porto Alegre 1.75 0.81,3.79 0.153
Santiago 7.17 2.58,19.93 0.000

Logistic regression model for the presence of gingival inflammation (average G-index ≥0.5) adjusted for gender, age, educational level, self-reported diabetes, self-reported hypertension, smoking, visual plaque index, calculus index for each city and for the total sample by city. The variables that are statistically significant for any city or to the total are shown