Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 20;15(6):2186–2202. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M115.057117

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

PPI quality metrics for benchmark data sets and high and low confidence D. vulgaris tagless protein pair sets. The top three rows show metrics for benchmark bacterial data sets: the EcoCyc complexes (41), and protein pairs that have been reciprocally confirmed in either four AP-MS studies, including ours, or in six Y2H studies (Experimental Procedures) (6). The remaining rows show metrics for sets of protein pairs identified by the MS-only and MS+STRING logistic regressions. The regression scores were used to rank and separate PPIs into a high and low scoring set in each case. The numbers of protein pairs in each set are given in brackets. The columns show from left to right: the percent of pairs whose members are encoded in the same operon; fold enrichment of pairs for which both members have the same TIGR role over that expected among randomly chosen pairs; percent overlap with PPIs from the D. vulgaris AP-MS interactome; percent overlap with a combined set of interologs from the three bacterial AP-MS interactomes for other bacterial species; and percent overlap with a combined set of interologs from the six bacterial Y2H interactomes (Experimental Procedures; supplemental Table S2).