Table 2.
χ2(df) | RMSEA | RMSEA 90% CI | CFI | SRMR | AIC | BIC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Affect | |||||||
| |||||||
Model 1+ | 57.97 (34)*** | 0.06 | .03–.09 | 0.96 | 0.07 | 5583.12 | 5716.74 |
Model 2 | 55.82 (34)** | 0.06 | .03–.08 | 0.97 | 0.07 | 7243.76 | 7383.83 |
Model 3 | 75.11 (34)*** | 0.08 | .06–.10 | 0.94 | 0.07 | 5603.19 | 5736.75 |
| |||||||
Negative Affect | |||||||
| |||||||
Model 1+ | 51.88 (34)* | 0.05 | .02–.08 | 0.97 | 0.05 | 4490.52 | 4624.07 |
Model 2 | 52.79 (34)* | 0.05 | .02–.08 | 0.97 | 0.05 | 6153.92 | 6293.99 |
Model 3 | 54.69 (34)* | 0.06 | .03–.08 | 0.97 | 0.05 | 4493.86 | 4627.42 |
Note.
p<.05.
p <.01,
p< .00.
Best Fitting Model. Model 1 = Bidirectional, Model 2 = Infant-Driven, Model 3= Mother-Driven