Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 28;5(10):2899–2908. doi: 10.1002/cam4.864

Table 1.

List of 28 master regulators that control geraniol‐specific cell cycle signatures

Gene ID Gene symbol Gene description FET P ‐Valuea Markers in regulonb Markers in intersection setc Moded Odds Ratioe NESf absNES Fold Changeg q‐valueg
79733 E2F8 E2F transcription factor 8 3.31E‐43 478 58 15.00 −13.72 13.72 0.66 0.00
4605 MYBL2 v‐myb myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog‐like 2 9.02E‐30 539 50 15.77 −13.79 13.79 0.68 0.00
2146 EZH2 Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (Drosophila) 7.32E‐24 578 46 12.25 −14.68 14.68 0.73 0.00
1063t CENPF Centromere protein F, 350/400 kDa (mitosin) 1.75E‐21 493 41 16.32 −12.51 12.51 0.56 0.00
3148 HMGB2 High mobility group box 2 3.34E‐20 501 40 8.74 −12.44 12.44 0.63 0.00
3149t HMGB3 High mobility group box 3 6.28E‐24 400 40 16.41 −11.34 11.34 0.75 0.00
8914 TIMELESS Timeless homolog (Drosophila) 1.04E‐21 457 40 10.64 −12.38 12.38 0.83 0.00
865 CBFB Core‐binding factor, beta subunit 8.91E‐15 597 37 9.97 −13.25 13.25 0.85 0.01
8607 RUVBL1 RuvB‐like 1 (E. coli) 1.29E‐11 751 37 9.14 −13.41 13.41 0.73 0.00
11137 PWP1 PWP1 homolog (S. cerevisiae) 1.47E‐14 571 36 6.98 −12.81 12.81 0.90 0.24
2305 FOXM1 Forkhead box M1 2.07E‐15 504 35 11.99 −13.21 13.21 0.69 0.00
9232 PTTG1 Pituitary tumor‐transforming 1 2.52E‐15 475 34 10.12 −12.19 12.19 0.54 0.00
4602 MYB v‐myb myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog 4.96E‐14 524 34 11.80 −11.35 11.35 0.62 0.00
7468 WHSC1 Wolf‐Hirschhorn syndrome candidate 1 9.73E‐12 590 33 9.17 −13.29 13.29 0.77 0.00
9735 KNTC1 Kinetochore associated 1 2.44E‐16 354 31 10.77 −10.71 10.71 0.70 0.00
10856 RUVBL2 RuvB‐like 2 (E. coli) 4.11E‐12 502 31 8.55 −11.67 11.67 0.83 0.00
4603 MYBL1 v‐myb myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog‐like 1 4.01E‐14 336 28 11.84 −10.73 10.73 0.76 0.00
2130 EWSR1 Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 5.32E‐13 372 28 12.31 −8.79 8.79 0.82 0.00
5252 PHF1 PHD finger protein 1 1.46E‐10 468 28 + 7.60 11.45 11.45 1.16 0.02
10849 CD3EAP CD3e molecule, epsilon‐associated protein 3.76E‐11 378 26 17.60 −11.50 11.50 0.79 0.00
221037 JMJD1C Jumonji domain containing 1C 1.08E‐08 453 25 + 19.28 9.36 9.36 1.32 0.00
7020 TFAP2A Transcription factor AP‐2 alpha 4.85E‐10 359 24 + 5.16 6.01 6.01 1.23 0.00
10042 HMGXB4 HMG box domain containing 4 1.86E‐05 582 23 7.59 −10.37 10.37 0.76 0.00
5036 PA2G4 Proliferation‐associated 2G4, 38 kDa 2.06E‐08 364 22 14.26 −11.18 11.18 0.82 0.00
9569 GTF2IRD1 GTF2I repeat domain containing 1 1.07E‐07 331 20 + 6.67 7.26 7.26 1.19 0.01
7027 TFDP1 Transcription factor Dp‐1 2.12E‐06 398 20 15.56 −11.73 11.73 0.70 0.00
86 ACTL6A Actin‐like 6A 1.55E‐06 287 17 7.17 −3.26 3.26 0.76 0.00
25909 AHCTF1 AT hook containing transcription factor 1 1.96E‐05 346 17 7.02 −8.44 8.44 0.83 0.01

The 28 MRs were sorted by largest to smallest by Markers in intersection set in descendent order. Odds ratio, NES, fold change and q‐value were rounded off to two decimal places.

a

FET P ‐value, the P ‐value from Fisher's exact test. It shows how much significantly the marker (gene) belongs to the signature set and the regulon of the master regulator (MR).

b

Markers in regulon, the number of markers (genes) found to be first neighbors of the master regulator in the loaded network.

c

Makers in intersection set, the number of markers found in the intersection of the signature and the regulon of the candidate MR.

d

Mode, plus mode means that the MR is positively correlated with up‐regulated regulons in geraniol cluster, and minus mode means that the MR is positively correlated with down‐regulated genes in geraniol cluster.

e

Odd Ratio, odds of a regulon gene being in the GSEA leading edge set/odds of a regulon gene being in the GSEA trailing edge set.

f

NES, GSEA normalized enrichment score for the regulon of the TF.

g

Fold change and q‐value were calculated from SAM analysis.