Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 11;36(5):605–624. doi: 10.1007/s40846-016-0164-6

Table 3.

Characteristics of various analytical techniques used for breath test [7, 61, 98]

Analytical method Typical compounds Limit of detection Advantages Limitations
GC–MS Sulfides, hydrocarbons, aldehydes ppt–ppb
ppt–ppb
ppt–ppb
High selectivity and sensitivity Large sampling time/requires standardization/requires preconcentration
PTR-MS Aromatic compounds, isoprene ppt
ppt
Analysis is real-time Small range of detectable compounds/compounds cannot be identified
SIFT-MS Ethanol, ammonia ppt–ppb
ppt–ppb
Analysis is real-time/wide range of detection Compounds cannot be identified
Sensor arrays/e-noses Various VOCs N/A Analysis is real-time/potential for portability and miniaturization Pattern recognition makes identification of compounds impossible
Ion mobility Isoprene, acetone, ammonia ppt–ppb
ppt–ppb
ppt–ppb
Vacuum systems are not required and ambient air can be used as a carrier gas Not very useful for identifying unknown compounds in multi-component mixtures
Optical absorption Ethane, carbon monoxide ppt
ppt
Analysis is real-time/potential for portability and miniaturization Limited by available technology to meet sufficient specificity/selectivity required for practical use