Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 29;27(11):3469–3478. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015091035

Table 1.

Subject characteristics and dialysis prescriptions at follow-up

Characteristic Intervention Group P Value
Standard Kt/Vurea, n=643 High Kt/Vurea, n=638
Characteristic
 Age, yr 58±14 58±14 NS
 Women, % 57 57 NS
 Black race, % 64 62 NS
 Diabetes, % 46 45 NS
 On dialysis, yr 3.8±4.1 3.8±4.2 NS
 Residual urea clearance >0, % 27 29 NS
 Weight after dialysis, kg 71±16 69±15 0.07
 Serum albumin, g/dl 3.6±0.4 3.6±0.4 NS
 nPCR, g/kg per d 1.00±0.26 1.07±0.31 <0.001
 spKt/Vurea 1.32±0.31 1.73±0.44 <0.001
Dialysis prescription
 Treatment time, min 193±62 221±63 <0.001
 Blood flow rate, ml/min 311±60 376±41 <0.001
 Dialysate flow rate, ml/min 639±134 708±116 <0.001
KoAurea, ml/min 547±55 563±42 <0.001
 Ultrafiltration, L 2.9±1.3 3.0±1.3 NS

Values for blood flow rate are adjusted from the blood pump meter values as described by Depner et al.43 Values for KoAurea are estimated as described in Concise Methods. P values were estimated by t or rank sum test for continuous variables and proportion ratio test for categorical variables without correction for multiple comparisons (NS is P>0.05). Normality of continuous variables was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The P values for continuous variables were similar, except for postdialysis weight P value was P=0.02 by t test and P=0.07 by rank sum test.