Table 3. Proportion of discontinued trials.
REC Freiburg | Other RECs1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Controlled trial | Single arm trial | Cohort study | Total NPSs | RCTs | Comparison total NPS vs RCTs P | RCTs | |
All studies | |||||||
Unclear/missing = excluded | 8% | 16% | 13% | 14% | 27% | <0.001 | 27% |
Unclear/missing = completed | 7% | 15% | 11% | 13% | 25% | <0.001 | 25% |
Unclear/missing = discontinued | 15% | 22% | 25% | 22% | 31% | 0.014 | 33% |
Unclear/missing = 50% completed, 50% discontinued | 11% | 18% | 18% | 17% | 28% | 0.004 | 29% |
Excluding studies stopped for harm, benefit, futility | |||||||
Unclear/missing = excluded | 4% | 13% | 13% | 12% | 19% | 0.057 | 22% |
Unclear/missing = completed | 4% | 12% | 11% | 11% | 18% | 0.047 | 20% |
Unclear/missing = discontinued | 12% | 19% | 25% | 20% | 24% | 0.251 | 29% |
Unclear/missing = 50% completed, 50% discontinued | 8% | 16% | 18% | 15% | 21% | 0.128 | 25% |
1 approved by 5 research ethics committees in Switzerland and Canada [1].
Estimated proportion of discontinued studies applying different assumptions for missing data with or without excluding studies that were stopped for intervention-related reasons such as harm, benefit, and futility (see text for a rationale).
Abbreviations: NPSs, non-randomised prospective studies; RCTs, randomised controlled trials.