Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Posit Psychol. 2015 Dec 8;11(4):399–415. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1117131

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Individual difference in active perceived partner responsiveness (APR) predicting daily adaptation in two conditions. Pre-tested global partner perceived responsiveness, family income, and relationship type were controlled. Range of daily adaptation scale: [1, 7]. Condition × APR interaction: b=.35, p=. 010; simple slope: b=.49, p<.000 for Expressed Gratitude condition, b=.14, p=.029 for Active Control condition.