Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Posit Psychol. 2015 Dec 8;11(4):399–415. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1117131

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Individual difference in active perceived partner responsiveness (APR) predicting T2 outcomes in two conditions. Corresponding T1 variable was controlled. Range of T2 relationship and life satisfaction scale: [1, 7]. For relationship satisfaction (panel A), pre-tested relationship satisfaction, global partner perceived responsiveness, and age were controlled. Condition × APR interaction: b=−.20, p=. 089; simple slope: b=.19, p=.035 for Expressed Gratitude condition, b= −.01, p=.871 for Active Control condition. For life satisfaction (panel B), pre-tested life satisfaction and global partner perceived responsiveness were controlled. Condition × APR interaction: b=−.35, p= .090; simple slope: b= .27, p=.076 for Expressed Gratitude condition, b= − .08, p=.571 for Active Control condition.