Table 4.
Perceived Responsiveness of Enactor’s Relationship Behavior Moderates the Effect of Condition on Participant’s Daily and T2 Outcomes
| Active Control | Expressed Gratitude | Condition X APR Interaction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| B. | Sig. | B. | Sig. | B. | Sig. | |
| Daily Outcomes | ||||||
| Relationship Evaluation | −.01 | .892 | .44 | .000 | .45 | .000 |
| Adaptation | .14 | .029 | .49 | .000 | .35 | .010 |
| Positive emotions | .02 | .544 | .31 | .000 | .29 | .001 |
| Negative emotions | −.01 | .529 | −.16 | .000 | −.15 | .003 |
| SWLS | −.05 | .298 | .20 | .049 | .26 | .024 |
| T2 Outcomes | ||||||
| Relationship Satisfaction | −.01 | .871 | .19 | .035 | .20 | .089 |
| Life Satisfaction | −.08 | .571 | .27 | .076 | .35 | .090 |
Note: N=92. B-unstandardized coefficients. The pre-test relationship evaluation was controlled when relational outcomes were tested. The corresponding T1 variable was controlled in all analyses when T2 outcomes were tested.