TABLE 3.
Comparison of polymer brush–coated AuNPs and amphiphilic block co-polymer–encapsulated AuNPs.
Amphiphilic polymer brush attached to the AuNP surface | Amphiphilic block co-polymer encapsulation of AuNPs | |
---|---|---|
Conjugation method | Covalent gold–thiol (Au–S) bond | Hydrophobic–hydrophobic interactions41,47 |
Advantages | Stable in organic solvent or water | Polymer thickness can be easily tuned |
Both hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymer brushes can be attached to the AuNP surface | The polymer layer can cover the whole AuNP | |
Can be self-assembled into various nanostructures, such as dimers and vesicles | Only amphiphilic block co-polymers are needed to encapsulate AuNPs | |
The ratio of hydrophilic to hydrophobic polymer brushes can be easily tuned | ||
Limitations | The polymer graft density is limited because of the steric hindrance of the polymer brush | The AuNPs should be modified with hydrophobic ligand first before encapsulation by the polymer |
The reaction method needs longer time to grow hydrophobic polymer brushes | The AuNPs cannot disperse in solvents that can dissolve the hydrophobic polymer |