Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Apr 28;42(12):1839–1866. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000281

Table 4.

Results of the linear mixed effects models for reading probability measures on the target across conditions. The left hand column represents the average effects across stimulus sets (because stimulus set was entered as a centered predictor) and the right hand column represents the tests for interactions between the preview contrasts and stimulus set. In the left hand columns, the intercept represents the implausible unrelated condition and the subsequent rows test for preview benefit effects—the difference between the named condition and the intercept. Significant effects are indicated by boldface.

Measure Contrast Overall Preview Benefit Interaction w/ Set
b |z| p b |z| p
Fixation Probability
Intercept 2.27 7.77 < .001 0.18 0.69 .49
Identical −0.39 2.13 < .05 −0.14 0.44 .66
Antonym/Synonym −0.33 1.88 .06 −0.44 1.26 .21
Plausible −0.21 1.15 .25 −0.51 1.52 .13
Regressions Out
Intercept −2.16 12.12 < .001 −0.22 1.14 .25
Identical −0.35 2.26 < .05 0.63 2.39 < .05
Antonym/Synonym −0.42 2.23 < .05 0.21 0.78 .44
Plausible −0.32 1.66 .10 0.23 0.89 .38
Regressions In
Intercept −1.49 11.22 < .001 −0.13 0.75 .45
Identical −0.66 3.55 < .001 −0.20 0.71 .48
Antonym/Synonym −0.14 0.99 .32 −0.14 0.55 .58
Plausible −0.003 0.02 .99 −0.04 0.19 .85