Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 17;474(12):2633–2640. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5024-8

Table 1.

Absolute and relative failure loads for the different resection depths*

Resection depth In vitro failure load Simulated failure load In vitro vs simulation
Absolute (kN) Relative (%) Absolute (kN) Relative (%) Mean difference (kN) p value
Intact (control) 10.4 ± 1.0 (9.4–11.4) 100 9.4 ± 2.4 (6.7–11.8) 100 0.4 ± 1.6 (−0.3 to 1.2) 0.278
3 mm 9.9 ± 1.0 (8.9–10.9) 95 ± 2.9 (92–98) 9.0 ± 1.4 (7.7–10.3) 85 ± 10 (74.7–95.2) 0.9 ± 1.5 (0.5–1.3) 0.004
6 mm 8.3 ± 1.0 (7.3–9.3) 90 ± 3.9 (86–93) 6.8 ± 1.8 (5.0–8.5) 79 ± 5 (74.5–84.1) 1.5 ± 0.8 (0.6–2.5) 0.013
9 mm 7.9 ± 1.4 (6.5–9.3) 81 ± 6.7 (74–87) 5.6 ± 1.7 (4.0–7.3) 67 ± 8 (58.8–74.5) 2.3 ± 0.7 (1.3–3.3) 0.028
p value 3 mm vs control 0.007 0.009 0.023 0.010 NA NA
p value 6 mm vs control 0.002 0.002 0.003 <0.001 NA NA
p value 9 mm vs control <0.001 0.010 <0.001 <0.001 NA NA

* Values reported as mean ± SD (95% CI); NA = not applicable.