Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J AAPOS. 2016 Sep 17;20(5):425–430.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.06.007

Table 5.

Frequency distribution of time from image submission to image grading completion by grading perioda

Time intervals, hours From image submission to image grading completion
From image acquisition to image grading completion
Before or on October 30, 2014 (n = 357 sessions)
After October 30, 2014 (n = 466 sessions)
P value Before or on October 30, 2014 (n = 357 sessions) After October 30, 2014 (n = 466 sessions) P value
No. sessions (%) No. sessions (%)
≤1 63 (17.7) 173 (37.1) <0.0001 0 (0) 4 (0.9) <0.0001
>1, ≤4 37 (10.4) 94 (20.2) 46 (12.9) 112 (24.0)
>4, ≤8 9 (2.5) 9 (1.9) 44 (12.3) 64 (13.7)
>8, ≤16 98 (27.5) 136 (29.2) 9 (2.5) 19 (4.1)
>16, ≤24 119 (33.3) 48 (10.3) 156 (43.7) 142 (30.5)
>24, ≤32 18 (5.0) 2 (0.4) 64 (17.9) 32 (6.9)
>32, ≤40 7 (2.0) 2 (0.4) 3 (0.8) 2 (0.4)
>40, ≤48 5 (1.4) 1 (0.2) 20 (5.6) 27 (5.8)
≥48 1 (0.3) 1 (0.2) 15 (4.2) 64 (13.7)
Median (Q1, Q3) 15.2 (2.9, 19.4) 1.8 (0.6, 14.1) <0.0001 20.2 (7.6, 24.4) 17.7 (4.1, 26.1) 0.003
Minimum, maximum 0, 65.6 0.1, 189 1.2, 620 0.9, 216
Adjudicated (%) 59 (16.5) 76 (16.3) 1.00
a

After October 30, 2014, the reading center implemented more systematic grading approach that required trained readers check the queue at least 3 times daily and complete all available gradings by the end of the day.