Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 17;2016:4137918. doi: 10.1155/2016/4137918

Table 2.

Interventional changes in strength and fatigue development.

Difference from baseline to follow-up  Between group difference at follow-up Group by time
Strength training Ergonomic training (usual care) Strength versus ergonomic P value P value
Hand grip MVC
 Strength (Newton) 43 (5 to 81) −61 (−96 to −26) 107 (69 to 144) <0.0001 <0.0001
 Extensor peak EMG (mV) 23 (−3 to 49) −1 (−26 to 23) 25 (−2 to 52) 0.06 0.18
 Flexor peak EMG (mV) 1 (−40 to 43) −2 (−39 to 35) 3 (−39 to 45) 0.89 0.90
Fatigue test
 Time to fatigue (sec) 23.5 (14.6 to 32.5) −7.0 (−96.9 to 82.7) 24.0 (14.6 to 33.4) <0.0001 <0.001
 Impulse (Ns) 6470 (4308 to 8633) 304 (−1883 to 2492) 6516 (4245 to 8787) <0.0001 <0.001
 Extensor peak EMG (mV) 47 (16 to 77) −11 (−43 to 20) 62 (30 to 95) <0.001 <0.01
 Flexor peak EMG (mV) −3 (−55 to 49) −3 (−57 to 51) −1 (−58 to 56) 0.98 0.99
 Extensor mean EMG (mV) 26 (3 to 49) −8 (−32 to 16) 36 (11 to 61) <0.01 <0.05
 Flexor mean EMG (mV) −13 (−54 to 27) 2 (−40 to 44) −18 (−62 to 26) 0.41 0.60
 MPF extensor (Hz) −7 (−13 to −2) 0 (−6 to 6) −7 (−13 to −1) <0.05 0.08
 MPF flexor (Hz) −5 (−13 to 3) −4 (−12 to 5) −2 (−11 to 7) 0.63 0.79

Changes in handgrip and fatigue test performance from baseline to 10-week follow-up. Associated changes in electromyography (EMG) are also illustrated. Differences of each group are illustrated on the left, and contrasts between the groups at follow-up in the middle. P values for the group by time interactions are shown on the right. MPF denotes “median power frequency.” Values are means (95% confidence interval).