Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 9;13(10):992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13100992
Hypothesis 5a: (1) UReffective + consistent precaution < URconsistent precaution and
(2) UReffective + consistent precaution < UReffective precaution
Hypothesis 5b: (1) CR1effective + consistent precaution = CR1consistent precaution and
(2) CR1effective + consistent precaution < CR1effective precaution
Hypothesis 5c: (1) CR2effective + consistent precaution < CR2consistent precaution and
(2) CR2effective + consistent precaution = CR2effective precaution