Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 May 6;25(7):1050–1058. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0104

Table 3.

Statistically significant (p<0.05) interactionsa between antioxidant & vitamin E transport SNPs and vitamin E supplementation interactions (p < 0.05) for risk of high-grade prostate cancer (N=1,124)

Genotype frequency Hazard ratio (95% CI) high-
grade cancer
Gene Genotype N (%) cases N (%)
controls
Placebo arm Vitamin E arm p-valueb
SEC14L2 rs5753106
AA 106 (59.2%) 543 (57.6%) 1.0 0.98 (0.64,1.49) 0.008
AG 65 (36.3%) 347 (36.8%) 0.74 (0.44,1.24) 1.25 (0.80,1.97)
GG 8 (4.5%) 52 (5.5%) 0.14 (0.02,0.99) 1.57 (0.63,3.91)
TTPA rs12679996
CC 69 (38.5%) 361 (38.9%) 1.0 2.29 (1.32,3.97) 0.001
CT 77 (43.0%) 426 (46.0%) 1.34 (0.74,2.40) 1.70 (0.98,2.94)
TT rs4606052 33 (18.4%) 140 (15.1%) 2.76 (1.44,5.29) 1.33 (0.60,2.97)
CC 62 (35.4%) 271 (29.9%) 1.0 2.25 (1.26,4.03) 0.007
CT 68 (38.9%) 434 (48.0%) 0.97 (0.53,1.79) 1.27 (0.71,2.25)
TT 45 (25.7%) 200 (22.1%) 2.02 (1.06,3.82) 1.38 (0.69,2.75)
a

Full results for all analyzed SNP x vitamin E assignment interactions are presented in Supplementary Table 3

b

P-value for test for interaction between SNP and selenium assignment for the outcome of risk of high-grade prostate cancer