. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 31.

Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2014 Dec;15(6):897–906. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0449-8

Table 2.

Fit statistic comparisons of latent class analysis models of school victimization and substance use models with covariates

Model	Description	School victimization			Substance use
Model	Description	Adjusted BIC	LMR-LRT p value	Entropy	Adjusted BIC	LMR-LRT p value	Entropy
1	One-class (no covariates)	8,180,146.022	–	–	5,323,905.862	0.0000	–
2	Two-class	4,855,872.593	0.0000	0.724	2,055,183.168	0.0008	0.800
4	Three-class	4,787,458.892	0.0000	0.685	2,009,106.900	0.0000	0.756
6	Four-class	4,751,154.994	0.0000	0.658	2,002,007.651	0.0000	0.738
8	Five-class	4,734,122.149	0.0021	0.643	1,992,189.895	0.7602	0.712

BIC Bayesian Information Criterion. LMR-LRT Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test p value for (K-1)-classes

A significant p value indicates that the (K-1)-class model should be rejected in favor of a model with at least K-classes

Best fitting models identified in italics